SHOSHIN-TANZA (3): Cowardly Backtracking
What did Master Dogen really intend by this instruction SHOSHIN-TANZA? I don't know. I can't know. I can form a view about it, but the stronger the view I form, the further away than ever I am from dropping off all views.
Intensive translation of Master Dogen's teaching, of the kind I have been doing for the past couple of weeks on Fukan-zazengi Shinpitsu-bon, is an open invitation to go wrong, to seek in the original text confirmation of one's own view, when it is just this view that is getting in the way of the translation doing itself. The more important the translator thinks his own view is and his own work is, the more emotion that he has invested in the process, the lousier the translation is likely to be.
Maybe when Master Dogen instructed SHOSHIN-TANZA his intention was, just as in the original Nishijima-Bailey translation, "Sit upright, holding the body straight." Maybe the true literal translation of SHOSHIN, as in the SZTP version, is "Straighten your body." I do not know. I cannot know for sure.
But one thing I do know. I know that my own reaction to the English instruction "hold the body straight" was well and truly wrong.
I had the truly chuckle-worthy idea that, by diligently trying to hold my body straight, I could make myself worthy of the epithet of "the most excellent Buddhist master in the world" (not my phrase). I had the idea that I could be not only one who was right -- which is enough of a delusion in itself -- but The One who is Most Right -- Mr. Rightness Itself. In short, Buddha.
Only after several years of Alexander work, did I really begin to see the point of dropping off this deeply (largely unconsciously) held view.
Alexander teachers in England showed me what I could not work out for myself in a month of Sundays in Japan: that the more deeply and completely I give up the idea of me being the one who is right, the more easily this body of mine rights itself.
This is not "Alexander theory." It is what I have actually experienced, what I continue to experience, what I continue to verify in my daily sitting-zen.
I continue to disturb myself by trying to let everybody know where and why I went wrong. But I can't stop doing it. However inept my expression of it is, I am expressing the only truth I truly know. The way Gudo taught me to sit, as if the righting or straightening of the body were something that should be pursued by direct means, was just plain wrong. For 13 years I sat following a completely wrong principle. That is all I know. My sitting was wrong. My sitting is still wrong. And at the root of the wrongness is the end-gaining idea of making myself right.
This is not "Alexander theory." It is something that Alexander teachers have guided me to investigate in my own experience, and to understand for myself.
I submit for your verification that the whole point of Fukan-zazengi is the giving up of end-gaining ideas, and so we should understand in this light the instruction SUNWACHI SHOSHIN-TANZA -- whether we translate it as "Just practice the upright sitting that rights the body" or as "Just sit upright, holding the body straight" or as something else.
Whatever translation is chosen, the universal truth that remains, it seems to me, is that it is not me who rights the body; it is not me who causes the body to grow. It cannot be me and my end-gaining ideas. It is upright sitting itself that rights the body. It is upright sitting itself that redeems the body. It is upright sitting itself that resurrects the body.
This is my strongly held view. I think it is important. Emotionally, I have a lot invested in it. I have a lot to drop off.
I would like to ask Master Dogen: "How can I drop off my own emotional view?"
Master Dogen's answer reverberates through the ages:
20 Comments:
If I could hazard a guess here--it would be that tightly held views are seen through when closely examined, and then become less important to me.
The more tightly held a view is, the more i have invested, the harder my investigation, and the longer it will take for me to see through it...
Thats what i've found for myself.
I have had views that simply dropped of their own accord, and others that i threw off because they damaged me.
Nice post.
Thanks Aaron,
The problem views are the views we don't realize we are holding -- our unconscious misconceptions, beliefs, prejudices.
For example, I think it is a very rare human being who is totally free of racial prejudice, but in a culture of political correctness it takes a brave man to see his own racism as it is. I think that what many of us do is hide our inherent racism from ourselves and then, following the mirror principle, project it onto others and criticize them.
That tendency is particularly strong, I think, among those who have the most strongly racist heritage of all -- people of a Jewish heritage. And the tendency is especially strong among so-called liberal or non-religious Jews who would like to reject their own racist heritage.
As Master Nagarjuna expressed it in the conclusion of MMK, dropping off of views is not only a matter of close examination. To drop off views is to realize the Buddha-Dharma -- in other words, to sit upright in the full lotus posture.
Mike, I am Jewish, although non-practicing, obviously.
Do you think Jews are more prone to be racist and prejudiced than any other group of people?
Also, are you stating that only sitting in lotus posture can create the kind of awareness you discuss?
I do not believe that lotus is necessary for that--i believe lotus is just one of many possible ways.
My teacher, who I feel is aware as anyone that ever walked the planet, does not recommend sitting lotus, but an entirely different method, which is what i put my efforts toward.
And i personally feel that sitting meditation and non-sitting meditation offer the same basic thing in terms of building or experiencing awareness, based on my experience.
I know we disagree on many points.
Aaron
This comment has been removed by the author.
Hi Aaron,
I think that all human beings are prone to be racist and prejudiced. I know that I, for one, certainly am.
Master Dogen wrote: BANBETSU SENSA TO IEDOMO, SHIKAN NI SANZEN-BENDO SUBESHI, "Notwithstanding ten thousand distinctions and a thousand differences, we should devote ourselves solely to Zen practice in pursuit of the truth."
I respect your belief and your efforts but, for me, the teaching of Fukan-zazengi is supremely valuable.
There are two sides to every disagreement, and the Buddha's teaching, as I understand it, is that both sides are invariably wrong.
Thanks for sticking with this blog and for having the latitude to agree to disagree.
To the person who expressed his view and then evidently regretted it and removed it... I feel a certain empathy towards you -- I know well what that feels like.
Fall down seven times and get up eight!
Or should we better say "post up seven views, drop off eight?"
mike - I did regret my post. sometimes my thoughts are better left unsaid. your views are your views and I know they are not always unconsidered no matter how overwrought they seem to me.
Hey Mike,
You didnt answer my question though, which was alluded to--if not specifically expressed in your initial response to me.
You said: "That tendency is particularly strong, I think, among those who have the most strongly racist heritage of all -- people of a Jewish heritage."
Do you believe that Jews as a group are MORE prejudiced than other groups (such as Protestants, Hindus, Hispanics, teachers, jugglers, etc)?
If so, why?
I respect your respect for Fukan-zazengi. I have said that your discipline in attempting to make sense of zazen as described in that book gives me a great deal of inspiration.
I am also inspired by dilligent poker players.
Thanks for the interesting discussion!
Aaron
P.S. I am only continuing to question your view on Jews because you so often express it here and I am having trouble understanding exactly why you feel this way or express these sentiments.
Hi Oxeye,
Thank you for continuing to give this blog your attention.
Yes, my state is a bit overwrought at present. I am planning to go to France on Tuesday and am hoping to finish Fukan-zazengi Shinpitsu-bon for my webpage before I go.
Alexander called this attitude end-gaining. Equally, Master Dogen called it GEGYO, the intellectual activity that he encouraged us to cease.
End-gaining means going for an end regardless of any compromise to one's own balance/integrity in the process. The worse a person's unconscious habits are, the more harm that person causes, to self and others, by end-gaining.
Sometimes I allow myself to indulge in a spot of overwrought end-gaining, anticipating later enjoyment of the backward step.
I don't necessarily recommend it, but this is sometimes what I do.
Three years ago, in the autumn of 2004, I was end-gaining like this, mixing some concrete in the garden as night fell. Just one more big load should do it, I thought, not noticing the cement mixer as it toppled over. The handle whacked me on the forehead and left a great big gash.
As a certain old bastard once commented to me when I expressed to him dismay about a manifestation of my own stupidity, "Human life is stupid."
Hi Aaron,
I think I have a problem with the Jewish idea of being a chosen people because somewhere along the line I got the idea that I was some kind of chosen one. I use neurotic Jewish behaviour as a mirror for my own state -- Woody Allen in Play It Again Sam, for example, contains one of my all-time favourite cinematic moments.
The idea of one's own specialness can be a strong motivator. But strong motivation can easily lead to imbalanced end-gaining. I think the attitude Master Dogen is praising in Fukan-zazengi is strong motivation without the end-gaining idea.
Hey Mike, pretty much all religions believe they are the "chosen ones" in one way or another, because their views of God are more correct than everyone else's.
I dont really care if you have a weird thing about Jews or Japanese people, but at the same time, if you continue making those kinds of comments, I think I will question you more about it.
I think lots of things that aren't very nice--things that if I said right now would make even you blush.
I dont feel the need to express every nasty, hurtful thing that wanders through my mind, as I would assume you dont.
So when something actually IS expressed, it would seem to be more than just a "passing thought."
We are all prejudiced, yes. And understanding that I have prejudices, some unexamined, is part of how I live my life.
Its part of knowing that I have a lot more to learn.
Sincerely,
Aaron
P.S. You never really did answer my question.
Here's a view for ya Mike:
You teaching on Jews is a fucking selfish, irrisponsible, self obsessed, sloppy bullshit pseudo intellectual abomination.
Hardly big news to your average reasonable person, but there you go.
Our sick little minds will throw this stuff up in bucket loads, I think its very healthy to realsie this happens; but to throw it up, to vocalise and unleash it into the world of impressionable minds who don't have the benifit of the view of Zazen is highly irresponsible. Wise up you big dope, your kids or grandkids might read this some day. Or maybe you like the idea of a "Mike's Youth" division?
Regards,
Harry.
Hi Aaron,
I think I did answer your question already. I am not the slightest bit interested in comparing what group is more prone than another group to racism. BANBETSU SENSA TO IU TO IEDOMO...
I am interested in sitting-zen as the dropping off of all -isms.
My point was that a brainy Jew like you, or a brainy member of a non-chosen race like me, are very prone to harbour -isms of which we are not aware. And thus we blythely discuss dropping off of views, as if we knew what we were talking about.
Don't ask me how I guessed you were Jewish. Somehow I intuited it. It takes a hypocrite to know a hypocrite.
"Proud of our understanding, full of enlghtenment... and yet we almost totally lack the vigorous means of getting the body out."
My intention on this post was to say something about the difficulty of dropping off deeply held views -- primarily my own.
What I write is primarily for my own benefit. I cannot be responsible for how others react to my spontaneous outpourings.
In sitting-zen practice, which is what this blog is all about, a view, any view, is nothing to get excited about, nothing to judge as good or bad, but just something to be abandoned.
"I cannot be responsible" will be the excuse for extreme human stupidity that will ring through the ages.
This is NOT Zazen, Mike. This is the internet, part of the real world of people having to live together and exchange information relatively: WAKEY WAKEY!!!
Regards,
Harry.
Mike said, "I am not the slightest bit interested in comparing what group is more prone than another group to racism."
Earlier Mike said: "That tendency is particularly strong, I think, among those who have the most strongly racist heritage of all -- people of a Jewish heritage."
Perhaps I made an illogical jump in pursuing that line of thinking Mike.
Kudos to you for intuiting my Jewishness!
Seriously, I am enjoying our dialog and am not the least offended.
Aaron
Thanks Aaron,
In not being offended, you are a credit to your teacher.
In Shinpitsu-bon Master Dogen writes of making it our sole task to perform a somersault and turn the head. So, yes, I agree that our understanding of how to wake up in the non-movement of sitting-zen can be informed by what we learn through the performance of simple movements.
That is why I came back to England to train as an Alexander teacher.
If we practice straightening the body unconsciously, that is only doing what we already know. But if we are able, even if it is only once, to turn our head in a non-habitual manner, that changes everything forever.
The thing is, the thing I see more and more clearly among trained Alexander teachers, is that we kid ourselves that we are moving in a non-habitual manner. We kid ourselves that we are free of former prejudices, misconceptions, and bad habits when in fact we are not.
Something offends me. I react unconsciously. I wish to preach the Buddha's truth, without having fully woken up myself. I am a fraud.
You, Mike, are certainly not a fraud. You are a traveler, a pilgrim, and describing the territory of your journey quite well.
So thank you for everything you are doing.
Sincerely
Aaron
Aaron,
You're a true Gentleman. How encouraging.
Regards,
Harry.
Post a Comment
<< Home